Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> This version is better as the proportions of the original carpet have
> now been respected.
>
> Not really an issue, but an even better version would be obtained with
> an uv_mapped image_map on the height_field. However distortions from the
> folds of the height_field are hardly or not visible in the present image.
>
> Thomas

Looks great, and ordinarily rugs sit pretty flat so not really an issue unless
you are planning on a flying carpet scene ;-)

Sean

Post a reply to this message