Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> I also think that it has something to do with motion blur. When you film
> something at 24 FPS, when there's rapid movement each frame gets more
> motion blur than if you film it at 48 FPS. Thus it makes the movie look
> sharper, but whether that's a *good* thing is another question. "Less
> motion blur" does not automatically mean "looks better" to the human
> brain.

yeah, it simply can't get in our heads that movies should do without motion
blur, lens flare and other artifacts of a device more limited than our own
eyes...

Post a reply to this message