clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 04.11.2012 20:46, schrieb MichaelJF:
>
> > Yes, your proposal is much more detailed than mine. In fact I only mentioned the
> > general idea that simply averaging pictures of a flight will not yield a motion
> > blurred picture and proper weights are needed.
>
> As a matter of fact, for /realistic/ motion blur simple averaging of the
> images /is/ the proper method. Whike the "opaque object with transparent
> trail" look is a common staple - probably invented to give the
> impression of motion while at the same time preserving object detail -
> it is outright wrong.

Thanks, clipka... I knew I wasn't going crazy :) Maybe MJF is confusing motion
blur with tracers?

Post a reply to this message