Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>
> Good start Michael. There are pros and cons about the laboratory
> environment for judging the glass but that is as it may be.
>
> I wonder if there should not be more iridisation, iirc, because of the
> age of Roman glass.
>

Thank you and all the others. I haven't understood the hint of nemesis since I
never encountered the phrase "depth of field" end espicially not its
abbreviation so far. So thanks to Cousin Ricky to point this out. I will use
focal blur within the finalisation of the scene. Stephen is right, the shape is
too perfect - despite the leaning bottle neck - but I will focus at the material
first. No, first I will put it out of the laboratory. A window sill overlooking
a garden for an unknown reason, with water and a flower ...

BTW the romans really crafted such glass ware. I modelled along an example from
a book about the topic. I exchanged the handle from an other glass but it is not
too much fluted. max_trace_level was 30 and the rendering time a little bit over
an hour at my new portable core i7.

Thanks for the suggestions and best regards
Michael

Post a reply to this message