|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> On 3-10-2012 22:24, Stephen wrote:
>
> Which is an excellent quality :-)
>
It can be a bit irritating, though.
>
> There is silt and silt. The finest particles will remain in suspension
> longer and, in the end, you will not see much difference between the
> central flow of the river and its borders. Well, close up maybe some but
> not dramatically so, with some transparency as a bonus, but all depends
> on the power of the stream.
>
Okay, no more arguments.
>
> Indeed, but now you are making my work very difficult ;-)
>
:-P
> The water transition between river and sea has been designed on
> "planetary" scale. This means that the whole water surface you see in
> the scenes is a huge sphere. It would be nice to control the river water
> from point to point but that would mean a break up of the sphere and a
> difficult design in the end. I am not (yet) up to that I must confess.
>
And you say that *I* am making your work difficult. Look in the mirror that you
promised Le_Forgeron.
PS A polished shield would make a believable mirror.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |