Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >> 2001 starts nowhere, goes nowhere, and ends up nowhere. It's almost
> >> /literally/ a series of random shots with no connecting narrative at
> >> all. (Except the middle part on the space station. /That/ almost makes
> >> sense.)
> >>
Stephen wrote:
> > The book has more of a beginning, middle and end than the film. I've
> > just finished listening to the audiobooks of 2001 & 2010.
>
> I think I read the sequel, and that seemed reasonably sane.

The book 2001 was better than the movie 2001.  The movie 2010 was better than
the book 2010 (although I don't know why the movie had to kill off Brailovsky).
In both the movies and the books, I could follow 2010 much easier than 2001.

Post a reply to this message