clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 05.07.2012 00:59, schrieb nemesis:
> > Orchid Win7 v1<voi### [at] devnull>  wrote:
> >> On 04/07/2012 09:33 PM, nemesis wrote:
> >>> Orchid Win7 v1<voi### [at] devnull>   wrote:
> >>>> But essentially, I have no idea what was actually written in those
> >>>> centuries, so I'm not qualified to comment further.
> >>>
> >>> fair enough.  You are not aware of so much stuff in your own time, knowing stuff
> >>> from just a few centuries ago is too much.  I can say, though, that Bach is from
> >>> that time frame.
> >>
> >> Interesting. I thought that Bach was far, far older than just a few
> >> centuries...
> >
> > ಠ_ಠ
>
> Unicode character insertion fail.

yeah, blame the povray web access to newsgroups.

In any case, here's the char:

http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/0ca0/index.htm

it's from reddit :)

Post a reply to this message