Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 04:41 PM, Darren New wrote:
> > On 6/7/2011 8:39, Invisible wrote:
> >> This would be a rather stunning result for AI.
> >
> > It wasn't even what you'd call AI nowadays. It was just pattern matching.
>
> Given that two different, unrelated recordings of the same piece of
> music have entirely unrelated waveforms, I'm not sure how you can claim
> that simple pattern matching would find such a complex similarity.
>
> > Why are you using the subjunctive, as if this is a fictional story?
>
> Damnit, now I have to go look up what a "subjunctive" is...

You're not matching the waveform but the spectrum.

Post a reply to this message