"Anthony D. Baye" <Sha### [at] spamnomorehotmailcom> wrote:
> As for it being flat and textureless: It isn't.

Well, it *looks* flat and textureless. And that's what it comes down to after
all, isn't it?

> The planet is a combination of
> isosurfaces, one for land, one for ocean, and the water is my best water texture
> yet (although I did remove the dispersion).

Isosorfaces for the planet? Seriously?

If you enjoy waiting 14+ hours for a render that *looks* like a 30 seconds
render: Go ahead! :D

Post a reply to this message