"Edouard" <pov### [at] edouardinfo> wrote:
> "Edouard" <pov### [at] edouardinfo> wrote:
>
> > David Buck <dav### [at] simberoncom> wrote:
> >
> > > I volunteered my time for a period of about a year to re-develop the
> > > IRTC site since nobody else was stepping up to the plate.  If I was
> > > going to rewrite the site software, it would at least be in a language
> > > which I like and understand well.  That's why I chose Smalltalk.  If
> > > anyone else volunteers to take over the project and rewrite the code,
> > > you can use any language you wish.
>
> David has emailed me, and is going to set me up with the development environment
> for website. Once I've got it I'll take a look at how it works, and specifically
> investigate the session code to see if we can remove the problem that was
> causing the issues.
>
> A public bug tracker might also be a good idea.
>
> Cheers,
> Edouard.

How did it go with this?

As I understood it, it was one function that borked the site. Why not just
remove that function until further notice and launch the rest?

Post a reply to this message