nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> gregjohn escreveu:
> > Gross Cost ROI Title  UV?
> > 36 150 -76% Mars Needs Moms   Yes
> > 196 150 31% Beowulf            Yes
> > 245 147 67% Hulk (2003)  Yes
> > 238 135 76% Rango          Yes
> > 306 165 85% Polar Express Yes
> > 336 155 117% Over the Hedge No
> > 383 176 118% Ice Age   No
> > 381 175 118% Monsters vs. Aliens No
> > 243 100 143% Meatballs No
> > 371 90 312% Rio        No
> > 632 92 587% Incredibles No
> > 1800 200 800% Titanic ----
> > 867 94 822% Nemo         No
> > 2782 300 827% Avatar         Debated
> > 1063 100 963% Toy Story 3 No
>
> so now, even cartoon animals like Rango are UV instead of bad movies
> with game-like graphics?  I suspect you just despise correct simulation
> of light, rather than fake scanline or simple raytracing with plastic
> phong materials.
>
> --
> a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9

BTW,

I think, this is not the place to discuss Polar Express vs. Nemo. I think,
we should admire Ive's work of shoes, which is over the edge of the UV in x and
in y in my opinion, a real good work and I congratulate him for this wonderful
picture.

Regards Michael

Post a reply to this message