Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 12:16 AM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> > Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> > to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>
>   I don't think it could be solved because it's not possible to perform
> the necessary rotations.

Ironically, your post was answered even before it is released. (Ook!)

On the other hand, it is questionable if you use sarcasm as a weapon, which I
prefer to believe rather than think a guy as smart as you lack the sensitivity
needed to see art in front of his nose.

No response is required. Thanks.

B. Gimeno

Post a reply to this message