Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Hallo!
> The render of the image I had to propose for IRTC testing session is
> ended yesterday (I have posted a version without water).
> My home hardware is a little obsolete and after a month render was at
> 30%, so I've asked help to a friend with a more efficient machine, which
> completed the work in less than two weeks (ok, I need to upgrade my
> hardware).
> I'm not happy of the final image because it is shady and the golden
> pieces composing the IRTC word doesn't shines as in my intention.
> Sources in p.b.i.
> Have a nice day,
> ;-)
> Paolo

Oh, in addition to my previous post: I also prefer to not use specular,
highlights, but keep it to reflection only and provide a background to reflect.
 While the colour and depth of water is defined by the interior colouring and
fading, the surface is best defined by what it reflects, even if it is just a
cloudy sky.

-tgq

Post a reply to this message