|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"fls13" <fls### [at] netzero net> wrote:
> Subtle difference, definitely an improvement, otherwise the same. Sometimes when
> you have a goal in mind, like making the displacement maps work, which they do,
> you forget other fundamentals.
Hm... displacement maps? So you're using isosurfaces?
(BTW, still not happy: Now I think the clouds look a bit too greenish - and the
Andes a bit too redish...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |