"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> > Maybe I just turned up that screensaver's star scale and recapped, I mean
> > there's no code to prove it, or is there? Not when those mouthing off are
> > allergic to clicking links and investigating the topic.
>
> If that is indeed a POV-generated starfield, all the worse - because it still
> *looks* like one of those ugly screensavers; anyone should die of shame within,
> say, 30 minutes, for selling *such* yucky stuff for stars :P...
>
> So my primary demand remains: Get a *MUCH* better starfield! Something at least
> *remotely* realistic.


I wrote about realism before, not going to do it again, just laugh out loud.
Where's your starfield? Or would that be TOO funny.

Post a reply to this message