"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> This is all true - it *is* intended to be subtle (as a rock sss effect would
> be), and it *is* clearer in the larger version. It is definitely visible in
> this version though: look at the edges of shadowed areas in the lower (closer)
> half of the image. The sharp red one (no 12 from the centre) shows it most
> dramatically, as well as the vivid green ones directly <-1,-1> from the centre.

Now I *do* see it, too.

(Yeah, I have seen the light! :P)

Post a reply to this message