"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> "clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > Um... yeah, if aside from area lights and radiosity you also did use isosurfaces
> > and media, then I'll keep my cake-hole shut :X
>
> The isosurface isn't obvious (although probably more needed than in the other
> image), but I would expect you to spot the media in the subsurface scattering
> on those gems... :-D

Now that you mention it...

.... honestly I still don't :}

Maybe it's one of those subtle things you only notice when it's missing, like in
"I can't really tell why, but the material doesn't look convincing to me"; and
maybe the 2000x2000 shot reveals it more clearly.

Anyway, I take that as a hint to get back into gear for further integration of
the experimental SSLT code :P

Post a reply to this message