|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Um... yeah, if aside from area lights and radiosity you also did use isosurfaces
> and media, then I'll keep my cake-hole shut :X
The isosurface isn't obvious (although probably more needed than in the other
image), but I would expect you to spot the media in the subsurface scattering
on those gems... :-D
> BTW, I don't agree with the other posters that the shot would look much better
> with transparent material; you win the caustics, but I guess you lose a lot on
> the shadow effect that this image shows off very impressively.
I thankyou. I may still try the glass version too though!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |