Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> On 3/26/2009 11:37 AM, Chris B wrote:
> > wise to totally change the product name. Otherwise there's a risk of
> > years of confusion that may create difficult barriers to new users.
>
> ACtually, this probably isn't a bad idea.  Perhaps Scene Object
> Language, or Scene Programming Language, to distinguish it from the
> current SDL.

Ah, now I get that point...

With the language no longer claiming to be merely a descriptive language for POV
scenes, I think the term "Scene Scripting Language" would be fitting.

(Dibs on the name "POV-Slang", which I intend to use as the name of a particular
proposal for such a language.)

Post a reply to this message