"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> I think this is why it never occurred to me, re: the HF_Square macro--I was
> expecting it to automatically be in that mode as well. Hmm, what a strange and
> semi-confusing difference. I can't truly understand why the macro wasn't set up
> 'out of the box' to duplicate regular HF behavior. (Probably having to do with
> the added feature of UV-mapping, I suppose.)

I guess it has more to do with the way the other macros work. HF_Square is
probably there mainly for completeness. With a sphere for instance, the
standard mode makes much more sense than the UV-mapped, IMO. So for the macro
suite to be consistent, it had to be made inconsistent with the regular
height_field.

Post a reply to this message