Alain <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> intervals 1 samples 100 is much FASTER than intervals 10 samples 10 or samples
> 10,10. If you use samples 10, 50 the value after the coma is always ignored when
> using the default sampling method.

I never really managed to grasp why the intervals are there in the first
place...

Post a reply to this message