stbenge <THI### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
> > In fact, just a little item missing in the foreground, which the figure
> > seems to be looking at. And maybe a bit more detail in the surface of the
> > ground.
>
> Yeah, that ground needs more work. Maybe I can get away with adding a
> few pebbles and an object of interest. (my gf suggested a flower) I
> might not have to re-render the whole thing, as I used compositing
> techniques to speed up the focal blur+radiosity rendering.
>
> > Your height_field is superb. Can tell? maybe, but those typical height_field
> > thingies are used here very effectively to texture the outcrop.
>
> It might help that I used the fastProx2 macro to darken the pits and
> cracks...
>
> > And I agree with Bill. Superb indeed.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Oh yeah, I forgot to mention in my original post that I had to use HDR
> images instead of PNGs for the compositing. There was no other way!
>
> Sam

Excellent image.  I'd love to learn how you do all this--like:  how did you make
that heightfield?  Where can I find that fastProx2 macro?  What kind of
compositing are you doing?

Thanks,

Kirk

Post a reply to this message