"Sven Littkowski" <Sve### [at] Jamaica-Focuscom> wrote:
> If your interesting cracks can work with unions and other of such
> combinations of shapes, then it would be even better than it is already
> now...

The crack is differenced from the block in the above example. It will work for
any valid parent object, including unions and properly-defined meshes.

(For complex, multitextured unions there will be coincident surface issues, but
this is a problem for any difference{} object - one just has to be careful when
designing unions!)

Bill

Post a reply to this message