Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> bluetree wrote:
> > "alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> >> Realism is over rated and content is more or less everything
> >> IMO
> >>
> >> aQ
> >
> > But if it looks too artificial and not at all artistic, it's not very good,
> > isn't it?
> >
>
> Depends fully of what you're aiming for. If you want to aim realism,
> artificial ain't answer. If you're creating art, un-artistic ain't
> answer. If you're doing something else (testing, learning, being
> different oslt) then artificial and unartistic is one way to go.
>
> --
> Eero "Aero" Ahonen
>    http://www.zbxt.net
>       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Wouldn't it work to do something which is realistic but also artistic in one
way? ^^
I'm still learning, but artificial and unartistic wasn't my intention... :)
I'll try to work harder to make some progress.

Regards
            bluetree

Post a reply to this message