I cast my vote for 100% rendered. The wrinkles in her clothes are fantastic, I
don't deny it --- maybe a bit too narrow for the type of fabric? The kicker is
that no photo shoot would have a woman sit so stiffly. Realistic posture and
gesture is, in my opinion, one of the hardest things to accomplish in a
rendered person. Traditional animators have access to stretch and squish to
make up for the lack of life --- those seeking realism loose that.

Same with the hair --- it's wavy. There's no reason to make it wavy except to
show individual hairs. A woman with such physical perfection would take care of
her hair.

Her face, as everyone has said, is certainly not real --- rendered or not, it's
a fake ;)

The grass gave me the most uncertainty. I finally decided I didn't like the way
it lay against itself. It might be real, but if everything else is rendered,
why bother?

Do we ever find out the truth?

--
S

Post a reply to this message