Kyle <hob### [at] gatenet> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:48:35 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>
> >It still strikes me as funky-looking to have a spaceship obviously not
> >designed to land in gravity nevertheless having flat decks for parking
> >runabouts on.
>
> That's exactly what I thought.

I've added some features and given in to the "anti-gravity" chorus a bit.
Now for some engines/nacells at the aft...

Any other suggestions?

Mike S.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'starship3.jpg' (106 KB)

Preview of image 'starship3.jpg'