"Mike Andrews" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Can anyone think of a work around or is it a show-stopper for what I was trying
> to achieve?

If your intention is to have something like:

#declare tr1 = transform {rotate -90*x translate <0,2,0>}

light_source { foo transform { tr1 } }

Then you can accomplish the same by using a macro rather than a declare:

#macro tr1() rotate -90*x translate <0,2,0> #end

light_source { foo tr1()  }

It's even shorter and reuses previous values just like in a declare. :)

Of course, a general matrix transform won't work while the bug isn't
corrected...

Post a reply to this message