"stm31415" <sam### [at] cscom> wrote:

> Yes, I understand/see the iterative process makes a major difference - what
> I am wondering is if the method you are using takes into account both the
> terrain and the neigboring plants, or just the latter.


Only plant competition was considered in WIP 1.
In the mean time I integrated water availability.


> As far as the reality of the control paramenters -- It doesn't really amtter
> if they are the real numbers, does it? The look of the thing is in the
> variation itself. You could use entirely fictional plants, and the process
> would still give you a result that is pleasing to the eye, because it
> defies the regularity of a less intensive approach. If you wanted it to be
> *just* like the real world, well, I have a very nice camera you could
> borrow ;) Seriously, though, it looks fantastic.


Thank you again. I fully agree with you.


Norbert Kern

Post a reply to this message