"Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > Trevor G Quayle wrote:
> > > Running 3.6 on a 1.8GHz laptop with 512MB RAM:
> > >
> > > 0.2  = 0:08
> > > 0.23 = 1:26
> >
> >    I guess we use the same technique but you optimized the SDL more
> > to be faster. Or perhaps you use something really innovative?
>
> Depends, I haven't seen yours yet... but based on the times, I would assume
> they are similar.  I don't think I did anything really innovative, just
> tweaked my algorithm to try to minimize the calcs required as much as
> possible.  Actually I started with a bit higher times for the 0.23, but
> made some algorithm optimizations to speed it up, then made some SDL
> optimizations for further speeding.
>
> -tgq

One further refinement in the algorithm

0.2  = 0:08 (no significant change)
0.23 = 1:11

-tgq

Post a reply to this message