Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Trevor G Quayle wrote:
> > Running 3.6 on a 1.8GHz laptop with 512MB RAM:
> >
> > 0.2  = 0:08
> > 0.23 = 1:26
>
>    I guess we use the same technique but you optimized the SDL more
> to be faster. Or perhaps you use something really innovative?

Depends, I haven't seen yours yet... but based on the times, I would assume
they are similar.  I don't think I did anything really innovative, just
tweaked my algorithm to try to minimize the calcs required as much as
possible.  Actually I started with a bit higher times for the 0.23, but
made some algorithm optimizations to speed it up, then made some SDL
optimizations for further speeding.

-tgq

Post a reply to this message