Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:
> m1j wrote:
>
> > This was not to be a comparison but that is what it became.
> >
> >
>
> Good line.  Yes it is a very open ended sort of exercise but of interest
> none-the-less.  It is not about the final conclusion but about what you
> discover along the way.  Logically, it seems to me that to get a "match"
> you will ultimately have to dumb down the comparitively superior
> abilities of each program.  OTOH, to make a comparison of quality you
> would end up with a circular sort of conclusion. But handled correctly
> the exercise could offer some interesting insights.

This is the best I have ever heard that put.

Post a reply to this message