|
|
"helge_h" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Nice; I like it a lot.
Cheers!
> I think closer and wider angle is better, more 'sci-fi', and gives the
> feeling of a large object. And have you thought about the background? A
> huge asteroid field and a big planet maybe? With black background and
> starfield...
The background will be the last thing I do, I suspect. I'd quite like to
keep it sky blue, so that the shadowed areas look properly lit (adds
realism). I like the idea that it's floating, lost, in some infinite sky...
But there has to be something behind it. I was thinking of hazy planets in
the distance. A non-planetary atmospheric volume like Larry Niven's 'smoke
ring' (in his novel 'the Integral Trees') or Iain Banks' 'airspheres' (in
'Look to Windward').
But, as with the vegetation, I shall have to experiment.
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|