Emerald Orchid <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Fortunately, most images don't have that much grass in them! ;-)
>
> But despite all that, what you have looks fairly good as it is. Manages
> to look suitably "random" without looking stupid.

Actually I only wanted to get this vaguely correct.  The idea for a scene I
intend to use it in isn't as close-up as those examples I posted so
hopefully I won't need to implement too much more detail.  Some extra
stragglyness would be nice, and slight variations in colour (particularly
patchy areas of lighter, drier grass) but I expect the general effect to be
ok.  The grass won't be the focal point of the image anyway.  I'm more
concerned with getting objects to nestle in the grass convincingly.

L
-

Post a reply to this message