Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> popov wrote:
> > What I'm trying to say:
> > It is better to have some warnings to much, than miss a warning
>
> Exactly, and in the flood of bogus warnings you get with all wwarnings
> enabled, you cannot see the useful ones.
>
>  Thorsten

This way you have a chance to see it. If you force the compiler not to print
the warning, you will miss it FOR SURE.

Post a reply to this message