> Straight Autocad - the good old 2002. I haven't been working with any
> version of ADT so far. Maybe it is high time to give it a try - the new ADT
> 2005 looks very interesting, except its price of course ;-) BTW - from your
> own experience - is it much easier and/or faster to make a coplete
> documentation of the building with ADT? Can it produce from 3d-model ready
> elevations and sections with dimensions, windows, doors and other symbols
> automatically or you have to do it by hand?

In my Architecture class, we had contests to see how quickly we could get
Autocad to crash. Good times.

It looks good, and the building looks great, but I agree that it would be
nice to make it look more realistic.

Post a reply to this message