Shay wrote:
>I will accept that Mael's entry was equivalent modeling wise with those
>three entries, but where are Mael's technical merit points for making
>his image clear and distinct, something the other three failed to do?
>Mael had at the bare minimum equal modeling technique to the others and
>in addition had superior textures and lighting.

I'm not sure the use of HDR lighting merits a high technical score. Not to
take anything away from this image, which is very good, but it's basically
a single model with a few textures. It looks great, no doubt, but lighting
a single model is easier than lighting a full environment; I'm sure most
judges rate images according to their degree of difficulty.

Post a reply to this message