Jim Charter wrote:

>I think it must be mentioned that while there is considerable overlap in
>their applications, they are separate tools with separate strengths.
>While either Hamapatches splines or Wings' mesh might have be applied
>with equal effect to achieve the smooth regularity of say bathroom
>fixtures, mesh comes into its own when achieving the smooth but
>irregular surface needed for organic effects.
>


Yes, Hamapatch splines definitely have advantages for certain things, and I
can get basic shapes very quickly. It is when I need more detail, such as
in a face, that it becomes unwieldy.

As you say,Wings is good for irregular shapes, and easier to work with to
get fine detail in something.

I've also found Wings to be a handy tool for editing Poser figures since
Poser has an annoying tendency to do very unnatural things to knees, elbows
& wrists.

RG

Post a reply to this message