I am going to purposely not take sides on the nudity issue, but instead turn
the whole discussion on its head.

Frankly, I didn't see ANY nudity in the image.  What I saw was a completely
100% computer rendered image.  There was no nude woman who posed for this,
and therefore trying to determine whether or not it depicts someone who is
nude, is completely left open to interpretation.  e.g. If I create an image
with a toaster on it that looks to some like a nude female, am I at fault?

Alright, I think I made a point, and hopefully added a little humor.  Those
who can't find the humor need to get a life.

Obviously this image had an intent, and was not meant to depict a poorly
designed toaster.  Whether or not it should say "Nudity" should be left to
the discretion of those that maintain the newsgroups.  Either make a rule
or don't.

From the FAQ - "News Server Acceptable Use Policy":

2.) We have a number of young people that visit this server. Because
    of this we ask that you keep this in mind before posting messages
    or images of an explicit sexual nature. While nudity is commonly
    used as a form of artistic expression we ask that you present it
    as tastefully as possible if you post images of this type. Use good
    judgment where this is concerned and be aware that children may
    be watching as their parents download images posted on this server.

    You might consider uploading images of a controversial nature to
    your personal web page and provide a link to it from a message
    posted here. This gives people the opportunity to decide if they
    wish to view material of this type at their own discretion.

Post a reply to this message