On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:16:31 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
>news:pdcda4d18v73c4feh22jl72ou3fqujs9a0@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:43:04 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>>
>>>"It follows that for every TC, (TC = RTC) is A-true or TC is A-equivalent 
>>>to
>>>RTC. .... Hence, (TC - RTC) is never false."
>>>
>>>    jstor.org
>>>
>>>     WOW!  :)
>>
>> Good to know and better than looking at chicken guts :)
>
>   Heh, I'm not going to ask what you've been doing today! ;)
>
>    Do you Stephen, (or anyone else), know what that statement actually 
>means? I know the result is 'never false', but 'what' is never false?
>

Haruspicy 
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message