On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 01:31:05 +0300, Vahur Krouverk
<vkr### [at] starmanee> wrote:

>This 'it does not support implicit rules' is not true, for I just hacked 
>together makefile, which uses implicit rules :-) But Borland's 
>imagination of makefile is somewhat different from MS. Or is it vice versa?

Glad to hear that, and glad to see you've brought Borland to their
knees finally :)


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message