|
 |
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:35:24 -0400 "Greg M. Johnson"
<"gregj;-()"@aol.c;-()om> wrote:
>#declare sarcasm=on;
>
>Shouldn't we simply tell those with the archaic readers simply to upgrade to
>cannot read a bleeding edge video format.
>
>#declare sarcasm=off;
No, Greg, it's simpler to ask that we extend the courtesy of posting
in a format (or sans format, actually) that can be read with *any*
newsreader, be it Netscape, MSIE, Agent, or slrn. HTML is fine for Web
pages and (arguably) software documentation but there are really few
benefits (specified fonts, colored text) I can think of for posting HTML
on a news server.
>I would argue for a common courtesy codec for posting images and videos as
>well.
For example?
--
Alan - ako### [at] povray org - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
