On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:25:54 +0200, Rune wrote:
>Cheap Grass.
>
>Pros:
>- Practically no memory consumption.
>- Can cover infinitely large areas, literally.
>- Parsing: ~3 seconds.
>- Rendering: Fast.
>
>Cons:
>- Not that realistic.
>- No good for close-ups.
>- No good for animations.

It does look good.  Hope you're going to source us. 

It looks like gras that's been recently cut and has 
dried out but stayed green.  

--
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  9:40am  up 11 days, 11:54,  1 user,  load average: 1.16, 1.09, 1.03

Post a reply to this message