|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:25:54 +0200, Rune wrote:
>Cheap Grass.
>
>Pros:
>- Practically no memory consumption.
>- Can cover infinitely large areas, literally.
>- Parsing: ~3 seconds.
>- Rendering: Fast.
>
>Cons:
>- Not that realistic.
>- No good for close-ups.
>- No good for animations.
It does look good. Hope you're going to source us.
It looks like gras that's been recently cut and has
dried out but stayed green.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
9:40am up 11 days, 11:54, 1 user, load average: 1.16, 1.09, 1.03
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |