On 11 Sep 2001 16:39:00 -0400, Ron Parker wrote:
>On 11 Sep 2001 15:38:02 -0400, Ron Parker wrote:
>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:04:41 +0200, tth wrote:
>>>"Redbeard (MDJohnson)" wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I can understand Windows balking at such a large image, but libpng
>>>> shouldn't.  IIRC, 30000 is well within the acceptable dimensions for PNG
>>>> files.
>>>> 
>>>	so give us a Linux beta, please :)
>>
>>But why?  Nobody uses Linux anyway, right? :)
>
>Speaking of the Linux beta, for whatever the information is worth I'd
>like to point out that the under-development Linux version of 3.5 was
>more than happy to render at least the first 300 lines of a 4000x30000 
>PNG of a randomly-chosen test image.

(translated: I have a Linux version and you don't!  nyah!)

Just kidding, of course.  We're working hard on getting a beta of the Linux
version out, but it probably won't happen for a while yet.

-- 
#macro R(L P)sphere{L F}cylinder{L P F}#end#macro P(V)merge{R(z+a z)R(-z a-z)R(a
-z-z-z a+z)torus{1F clipped_by{plane{a 0}}}translate V}#end#macro Z(a F T)merge{
P(z+a)P(z-a)R(-z-z-x a)pigment{rgbt 1}hollow interior{media{emission T}}finish{
reflection.1}}#end Z(-x-x.2y)Z(-x-x.4x)camera{location z*-10rotate x*90}

Post a reply to this message