On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 22:56:44 +0300, Margus Ramst wrote:


>I did try building kernel 2.4.6 with gcc 3.0 BTW, but the result was
>decidedly not stable.

[snip]

I've found the performance of 2.4.6 to be much better tna 2.2.14 which
I have at the moment, the multitasking is so much quicker, and programs
open so much faster (as I've seen when booting with 2.4.6). 

--
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  2:18am  up  5:08,  2 users,  load average: 1.00, 1.03, 1.08

Post a reply to this message