|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:08:47 -0400, Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> I think "grotesque" is appropriate... perhaps descriptive of the house
>than "hideous" but certainly describes the whole effect in it's setting.
>Although I like the idea of the house, it is set in a classic, almost
>picturesque neighborhood and I am sure the entire area is made unnatural
>seeming because of it. It looks like a piece of industrial waste filtering
>machinery that the city forced upon the poor residents.
>
> If it had been set in a more modern area, or set apart from the cottages
>one sees in the background, perhaps it would seem less grotesque and more
>"innovative", or "striking". Less rude and intrusive and more artistic.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
9:46pm up 3 days, 19:39, 2 users, load average: 1.02, 1.06, 1.03
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |