|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 2001-02-02 21:29, D.J. Brown <ext### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlu co uk> wrote in message
>news:3a7ae96e@news.povray.org...
>> BTW jpeg compression has been suprisingly unpleasant to them -
Have a look at
http://www.students.tut.fi/~warp/povVFAQ/filesVFAQ.html#noartifactsinjpeg
>> is png acceptable for the majority now?
>
>I think PNG would be fine for everyone.
PNGs are for most scenes a lot larger than JPGs. So for those of us who
use modems and don't have a flat rate, they are a waste of resources and
money.
>It's the recommended replacement for GIFs by the W3C and has built-in
>gamma correction.
Yes, that's handy. PNG is a very nice file format, but the lack of a
lossy compression mode is really a disadvantage compared to JPG.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | All Linux applications run on Solaris,
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | which is our implementation of Linux.
| | | hjp### [at] wsr ac at |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Scott McNealy, Dec. 2000
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |