POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? : Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? Server Time
2 Sep 2024 00:15:33 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions?  
From: Ron Parker
Date: 31 Jul 2000 15:20:05
Message: <slrn8obl55.1qn.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 14:59:53 -0400, pk wrote:
>Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>> 
>> In article <3985C626.46C5B6E8@videotron.ca> , pk <thi### [at] videotronca>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> > Could somebody explain why the patch uses "^" for something else than
>> > exponents??
>> 
>> As far as I know it does not use it for anything else...
>Then, why did warp say "^"(that's an inverted V, right?) does the
>opposite of &?

He was referring to the mathematical symbol that looks like an inverted V.
That symbol represents logical "and", and looks nothing like a caret.

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.