On 28 Jun 2000 15:42:35 -0400, daishi wrote:
>while I agree with what your saying. there was an article a while ago 
>discussing NT vs win98 that said win98 was cooporative. I can't seem to 
>find the article though...
>
>win98s scheduling needs improvement then, cause compared to other multi-
>tasking OSs it sucks..

It's no more cooperative than NT.  It sucks because it switches back and
forth from the (mostly non reentrant) 16-bit core a lot.

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.

Post a reply to this message