Some of us pay for the use of the phone line, and d/l all of the messages
in one go then read them off line.  So if someone posts an unsuitably big
image or irrelevant binary, then we pay for the d/l weather we wanted to 
see it or not.  

As long as everyone exersises caution and consideration when posting then
everyone will be happy.



On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 23:56:14 -0500, Ian Burgmyer 
<the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>omniVERSE <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
>news:386e70f3@news.povray.org...
>> These pictures are making for one heck of a large file size even
>compressed.
>> Should any future posts be uploaded to webspace and not here then? I too
>> have a render of this going now and thought I would only do it that way if
>> it seemed reasonable to upload at all.  What do you all think?  Bringing
>> this up because I can see it being redone many more times if new additions
>> are made.
>
>I think it's okay.  It's our choice to download it.  The file size is
>usually shown on news clients, and also, seeing 3200x2400 in the header will
>tell you that it's big.
>
>As long as it's not done for everything, I don't care, but if someone
>displays a test image of a box in 3200x2400, then I think I'll go nuts :)
>
>--
>This message brought to you by:
>-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
>
>Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
>
>


-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  3:15pm  up 13:49,  1 user,  load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00

Post a reply to this message