On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 17:42:57 -0700, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
>
>
>Ron Parker wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 1999 00:05:02 +0100, Steve <sjl### [at] ndirectcouk> wrote:
>> >Ron
>> >
>> >is this better?
>> 
>> Not really.  UTF-8 is a Unicode encoding, so unless you'll be doing a lot of
>> posting in weird languages, I'd suggest us-ascii or whatever the ISO Roman
>> standard is.  A quick survey of posters here suggests us-ascii is the local
>> preference.
>
>  I have mine set to Western (ISO-8859-1) and have never heard anyone complain.

That's the one I was thinking of.  Actually, yours comes through as us-ascii,
but that must be a modification they're making behind the scenes.

Post a reply to this message